On This Page

Stanford RDO is pleased to share our subscription to the Research Development & Grant Writing Subscription Newsletter with the Stanford community. The newsletter is produced by Academic Research Funding Strategies, LLC, and contains useful information for both new and seasoned grant writers across disciplines. Please see below for selected highlights from each issue. Click on the issue heading to go to that particular newsletter, or access the entire Stanford RDGWN library.

To access, you will need to log in with your SUNet credentials. You are welcome to share the folder link above with others at Stanford. If you choose to share a different way, we ask that you maintain SUNet ID protection as required by our institutional subscription. 

Newsletter Issues

August 2022

Suggested read: "Reading the Funding Tea Leaves: How to Anticipate New Funding Opportunities"

Valuable tips on how to ascertain and prepare for likely future funding opportunities. The ways that funding opportunities are signaled through NSF Dear Colleague letters, NIH Concepts and NOSIs, and Mission Agency activities and publications are discussed.

Also useful: The Role of the Project Evaluator on the Writing Team

In addition to evaluating an active or completed project, some project evaluators can be engaged to support the efforts of the proposal writing team. This article includes rationale and advice for meaningfully including the project evaluator in the proposal writing process.

July 2022

Suggested read: "Tips for Effective Proposal Graphics"

Most people know that visuals are an important elements of successful proposals, but the execution can be challenging. This article is packed with useful reminders and best practices for effectively incorporating images, figures, and other graphic elements into your proposal.

Also useful: 

  • "What does NSF Mean by Innovation Ecosystem?" 

  • "Changes Coming to STEM Education Programs"

  • "Newly Titled National Science Foundation Program Offers Humanities/Social Science Researchers Opportunities to Collaborate"

June 2022

Suggested read: "NSF Begins Using Broad Agency Announcements (BAA)"

NSF has recently started using Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) to engage new communities of scientists and engineers, including those working outside of Institutions of Higher Education. This article explains more about the reasons behind this new approach, as well as pointers for accessing and effectively responding to BAAs.

Also useful: "NSF's New Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP) Directorate" and "Defining and Supporting Your Premise"

Learn more about the first new NSF Directorate to be established in 32 years, as well as the new funding opportunities TIP offers. 

May 2022

Suggested read: "Planning and Describing your CAREER Education Component"

Valuable advice for junior faculty applying to NSF's CAREER program on how to create an education plan that is integrated with and as rigorous as your research plan.

Also useful: "What Does a Successful ERC Proposal Look Like?"

A discussion of key traits of successful NSF Engineering Research Center (ERC) proposals. This article also contains an outline to guide your ERC preliminary proposal project description as well as information on four recently funded ERCs (with sample research narrative text specific to their projects!).

April 2022

Suggested read: "The Curse of Knowledge and Writing Your Proposal"

A short guide to understanding and overcoming one of the most common proposal-writing challenges, i.e., the background and work plan of the proposed research are completely obvious to the writer but are not yet conveyed in a way that is obvious to a reviewer. Hint: The solution involves understanding who likely reviewers are, and recruiting outside reviewers during the proposal writing process -- two things RDO can help you with!

Also useful: "NSF FY2023 Budget Request: Where the Money is Going"

Mike Cronan summarizes NSF's 674 page budget request to congress in terms of what it means for researchers. Although the budget numbers are not yet final, the request gives a sense of NSF's priorities for the near future, including new program focus areas and modifications to existing program budgets.

March 2022

Suggested read: "How to Formulate Hypotheses for NSF & NIH"

This article tackles a perennially useful topic, breaking down how to formulate different types of hypotheses for different types of proposals as well as how to determine when a hypothesis is needed in the first place. 

Also useful: "DOE's Plan to Strengthen Clean Energy Supply Chains & Bolster Domestic Manufacturing"

Provides a high level overview of reports delivered in response to the Executive Order on America's Supply Chains. These reports signal how U.S. foreign policy might change research and funding priorities across federal agencies into the future, given the renewed emphasis and urgency surrounding energy independence.

February 2022

Suggested read: "Overview of the New Quantum Workforce Development Plan"

A helpful summary and contextualization of the National Science and Technology Council's (NSTC) Quantum Information Science and Technology Workforce Development National Strategic Plan released on February 1, 2022. The report itself provides a wealth of information to inform the language and framing of relevant proposals. The Newsletter lays out the main challenges and recommendations given in the Plan, and highlights the resources provided to support proposals with Quantum Information Science and Technology workforce training components.

Also useful: "The New Research Agenda for the National Endowment for the Arts, 2022-2026"

Humanities Editor Katherine E. Kelly spotlights the NEA's future funding preferences and the agency's signal that they will rely more heavily on their Research Grants in the Arts and Research Labs funding mechanisms moving forward. Includes an introduction to both of these funding programs and their review criteria.

January 2022

Suggested read: "Is an NSF Center Proposal in Your Future?"

This article features an in-depth explanation of NSF's Growing Convergence Research program. Being selected for and participating the Growing Convergence Research program can provide a competitive advantage for later center proposals (e.g. STC, ERC),  as it allows researchers to build a strong research core that incorporates NSF's vision of convergence research before applying for center funding.

Also useful: "Editing Proposals for Significance: What It Is and Why It Is Critical to Funding Success"

Suitable for proposers across disciplines, this article offers advice for considering both general and agency/solicitation-specific concepts of "significance," as well as common mistakes to avoid in writing your grant proposal.

December 2021

Suggested read: "'Oh what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive!"

If you've ever wondered where the boundary between appropriate and inappropriate use of source material in a proposal lies, or how familiar you need to be with new guidance on disclosures, this list of examples of research misconduct from the NSF Office of the Inspector General's semiannual report is both a useful source information and a collection of cautionary tales.

Also useful: "Describing the Methodology and Work Plan in an Individual Humanities/Humanities-Related Social Sciences Proposal" and "The Best Order of Research Narrative Edits"

Both of these articles are practical guides for PIs, grant writers, and anyone who would like to take a more considered approach to how they write and edit their proposals. As the title suggests, the former is most relevant to Humanities and Interpretive Social Sciences.

November 2021

Suggested read: "The First Step to STC Success is to Learn the Language"

For those interested in the NSF Science and Technology Center programs, this article digs into what NSF means by language such as "an integrative partnership," "discover and innovation," and "vexing scientific challenges," and gives advice for mapping proposal narratives to cover what is meant by these terms.

Also useful: "Educational Grant Writing Resources"

More information on the U.S. Department of Energy Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad (GPA) application cycle for FY2022.

October 2021

Suggested read: "Humanities Scholars: Applying for ACLS's 'Sustaining Public Engagement Grants' (SPEG)"

Discusses what the Sustaining Public Engagement Grant program is, how to apply for funding, and resources that can assist you in preparing your application.

Also useful: "White Papers and Concept Papers Are Often the First Step to Funding Success"

Explains what white papers and concept papers are, and how they can be used to advance in the funding application process.

September 2021

Suggested read: “Funding to Broaden Participation in STEM of Persons with Disabilities”

Co-publisher Lucy Deckard discusses funding opportunities and resources PIs can use to broaden participation of persons with disabilities in STEM through sponsored activities and projects. Specific funding opportunities are named and linked.

Also useful: “Why You Need a Communications Plan for Multidisciplinary Research Partnerships."

While communication plans are increasingly called for in center-level project proposals, the author explains why they can be beneficial in smaller proposals, even when not required.

August 2021

Suggested read: “Does Your Research Narrative Require a Description of Stakeholder Engagement?”

This article gives an outline of what you can discuss in a required stakeholder engagement section (whether specifically named or implied by a request to name "societal benefits"), along with suggestions on taking the content beyond a perfunctory level.

Also useful: “Organizing Your Response to Reviewers’ Comments on Resubmittals”

Responding to reviewer feedback can be daunting, but this article gives some useful advice to get you started.

July 2021

Suggested read: “Because a Management Plan Is Not Required Does Not Mean It Is Not Necessary” 

Newsletter co-publisher Mike Cronan points out that while some solicitations do not explicitly require a management plan, leaving out this component could reduce your chances of receiving funding. He notes that a project timeline is not equal to the management plan. Management plans will give reviewers insights into the project’s rationale, how the work will be coordinated, and how the team will be integrated.

Created: 10.07.21
Updated: 08.16.22