Award Acceptance: Review Award Terms and Conditions
All sponsored project awards contain terms and conditions; it is essential that the Research Administrator read, understand, and follow them.
Sponsored Project Award Agreement Types
Sponsored project agreements are typically categorized into these mechanisms:
- cooperative agreements
Over 70% of Stanford's sponsored projects are supported by grants. These agreements can be viewed as assistance and are significantly less restrictive than contracts, which may be thought of as procurements. The intent of the sponsor dictates which type of agreement is used.
At one end of the spectrum is a grant, which is financial assistance to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation where typically the only deliverable is a final report. At the other end of the spectrum is a contract, which is intended for the purpose of acquiring goods and services for the direct benefit of use by the contractor.
All four agreements are legal documents with their own set of terms and conditions that stipulate obligations and responsibilities.
Sponsored Award Agreement Types
An award of financial assistance bestowed to carry out a scope of work. The sponsor is a passive participant and has no substantial involvement in the work.
An award of financial assistance bestowed to carry out a scope of work, but differs from a grant in that sponsor has substantial involvement, or is a partner in the work.
Typically considered a procurement action. The sponsor is a buyer of goods and services for the direct benefit of the sponsor. The sponsor may act as technical overseer and may have substantial involvement. Contracts have firm timelines and deliverable requirements. Sometimes, terms and conditions are identified prior to submitting a proposal, and confirmed prior to accepting a contract. Contracts can have various payment structures:
Cost Reimbursement Contracts: Provide for sponsor payment of the allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs of the project. They are designed to estimate total costs required for the work, and expenses are reimbursed as costs are incurred. Cost reimbursement contracts set a spending ceiling that the investigator may not exceed without additional funds being allotted by the sponsor’s contracting officer.
Firm Fixed Price Contracts: Establish an agreed-upon price for performing the work, as determined by Stanford’s proposed estimated costs and the program officer’s approval. Firm fixed price contracts do not provide for any cost adjustments, and place Stanford at maximum risk for assuming full responsibility for total project costs.
Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials: Funded by private industry to investigate the effects of drugs or devices on patients with specific clinical indications. They have FDA permissions to conduct the study for the purpose of acquiring the FDA’s approval of the drug or device itself. Typically paid for on a per-patient basis.
JPA (Joint Personnel Agreements): Cost Reimbursement Contracts in which the sponsor purchases services of specific Stanford University staff on research projects. It must be for research purposes. These are for salary only.
A contract to perform a specific scope of work that is a portion of an overall project that was awarded to another entity. Subcontracts can be awarded on a cost-reimbursement or fixed-price basis and often includes our sponsor passing down the award terms from the ultimate source of funding, or the prime sponsor
|Specialty Award Agreement Types||Responsible Office (to sign)|
|Human Tissue/Clinical Material Agreement||ICO (Industrial Contracts Office)|
|Clinical Material Agreement||ICO|
|$0 Collaboration Agreements||
|Data Use Agreements||
|Intergovernmental Personnel Agreement (IPA)||OSR|
JPA (Joint Personnel Agreement)
(AKA Non-disclosure Agreement)
|PI (agreement must be between a PI and a company)|
|MTA (Material Transfer Agreement)||ICO|
|Human Tissue/Clinical Material Agreement||ICO|
About Terms and Condition
The terms and conditions are either attached to the award document or incorporated by reference. Most sponsors incorporate terms and conditions by reference, which may be found on the web by searching for the awarding agency. The Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) or your school-based management team can help you find and recognize terms and conditions for a sponsored project award.
It is critical that you read and understand the terms. Terms and conditions also flow down to sub recipients of contracts and grants (e.g., to subcontractors on Stanford awards), so be sure that they are also aware of their contractual obligations.
Terms and conditions often contain prior approval requirements, spending limitations and requirements for billing and reporting. They may also contain requirements for budget expenditures and unallowable costs. There may be requirements embedded for prior approvals by the sponsor before certain expenditures are allowed, for example, for foreign travel, food, or equipment. Some expenditures may be specifically identified as unallowable. They also contain requirements for the submission of various reports including the technical reports that need to be submitted by the PI.
Federal Research Terms and Conditons
The new Federal Research Terms and Conditions (RTCs) have been approved as of March 14, 2017 and will become effective as early as April 3rd, 2017 (NIH, NSF and DOE) for federally funded new and renewal awards from participating agencies (see list below).
What are they?
The new RTCs implement Uniform Guidance as it applies to research and research-related grants made by the Federal awarding agencies specified below to institutions of higher education and non-profit organizations. While the Uniform Guidance outlines provisions that are specific to research, these terms and conditions:
- Incorporate the entire Uniform Guidance by reference, clarifying or supplementing select provisions where appropriate and consistent with government-wide research policy.
- Incorporate the set of Frequently Asked Questions in effect at the time the award that is made for the Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR § 200 (located at https://cfo.gov/cofar-resources ). These FAQs are meant to provide additional context, background, and clarification on the policies described in 2 CFR § 200.
- Apply to an award when included as part of the award or when incorporated in the award by reference.
In addition to these Research Terms and Conditions, there are three appendices that provide additional guidance on pre-approval requirements:
• Appendix A, Prior Approval Matrix;
• Appendix B, Subaward Requirements Matrix; and
• Appendix C, National Policy Requirements Matrix.
What agencies participated and what is their implementation timeline?
Here is the list of agencies that participated in this effort, their implementation date, and agency specific requirements :
- U.S. Department of Commerce: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Institute of Standards and Technology , October 1st, 2017
- U.S. Department of Energy, April 3rd, 2017
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Anticipated date: December 2017
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration, October 1st, 2017
- National Science Foundation, April 3rd, 2017
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health, April 3rd, 2017
- U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and Agriculture, June 1st, 2017
- U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration, October 1st, 2017
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security, To be determined
How do I know if I have an award with the new RTCs?
- These Research Terms and Conditions will apply to an award when included as part of the award documentation or when incorporated by reference.
- Please note that additional agency-specific requirements may apply in addition to the RTCs.
Who do I contact if I have questions about the terms and conditions that apply to my award?
Your Institutional Official at OSR or RMG can answer any questions you may have regarding the terms and conditions that apply to your award.
Federal Contract Terms and Conditons
Federal Contracts use FAR clauses as their terms and conditons. The vision of the FAR System is to deliver on a timely basis the best value product or service to the customer, while maintaining the public’s trust and fulfilling public policy objectives. Clauses are either incorporated by full text or referenced by number in your contract. They are the terms and conditions of the contract. Review the list FAR clauses or contact OSR for help when working with Federal Contracts.
Travel on Federal Awards
Federal regulation and Stanford Policy require (with some exceptions) travelers who will be reimbursed by federally sponsored projects to use U.S. flag air carrier service. This is known as the "the Fly America Act”.
There is an exception to the rules of "the Fly America Act". The exception is called the "Open Skies Agreement". The Open Skies Agreement allows travelers who will be reimbursed by federally sponsored projects to use European Union (plus Norway and Iceland), Australian, Japanese, or Swiss airlines.
The Open Skies Agreement does not apply if travel is funded by the Department of Defense (DOD) or by a department of the U.S. Military. Travel funded by the DOD or by a U.S. military department must be on a U.S. flag air carrier.
For more information go to Fingate: Fly America Act and Open Skies Exceptions. From this page you can click on a destination for specifics on allowable conditions and air carriers.
For assistance on travel contact the Financial Support Center at 3-2772.
Review Terms and Conditions
Before accepting an award on behalf of the University, the institutional Official reviews all terms and conditions, regardless of the sponsor, and is responsible for negotiating appropriate remedies if an award fits into one of the following categories:
- It contains provisions that are incompatible with the Stanford's policies on sponsored research
- It is inconsistent with government-wide regulations for universities
- It fails to include all elements agreed upon prior to the award
- It requires modification to conform to the PI's needs
A hierarchy of policies and rules provides standards for handling financial transactions for federal contracts and grants. The rules are complex and detailed; always check the exact text of the rule or policy rather than relying on your general recollection. In looking at the hierarchy of regulations, University policy must always be followed. Terms and conditions take precedence over all. When the University accepts the terms and conditions of an award, we are bound regardless of whether they conflict with University policy.
Note: State of California awards often have very explicit restrictions on budgets; so be sure to review each of these award terms and conditions in detail!
In the case of all industry awards or other awards with non-standard patent, copyright, or licensing terms, the Industrial Contract Office must also approve the award terms. This approval is coordinated by your pre-award office.
Key Clauses May Be Negotiated
Typically negotiation is not required on a federal grant because the terms and conditions are prescribed, but in some cases, the following clauses may be subject to negotiation:
Stanford policy prohibits the acceptance of any award that prohibits or restricts publication, access, or dissemination of research results or prevents Stanford from disclosing the existence of an agreement.
Stanford does not cover sponsor loss unless SU is negligent or exercises willful misconduct.
Stanford does not guarantee any research results.
Stanford as an institution cannot agree to protect a sponsor’s proprietary information. An individual may enter into a non-disclosure agreement with a sponsor.
Stanford does not accept provisions which impose unlimited liabilities for Stanford. Example: re-procurement provisions.
Stanford retains title to intellectual property.
The financial viability of some commercial sponsors may not be readily apparent and must be researched prior to accepting an award.
Stanford's Openness in Research policy permits the acceptance of export controlled information only if foreign national members of the research group are able to continue to "participate in the intellectually significant portions of the project". Similarly Stanford will not accept research agreements whose results are subject to export controls.
Once the terms and conditions are agreed upon, the award is signed by the IO (Institutional Official) on behalf of Stanford University. In those instances where a Stanford signature is not required on the agreement (such as federal grant awards), acceptance of the terms is typically indicated when the expenditures on the award have taken place and/or the check is cashed or funds drawn from the government. For this reason, PTAs are not established until after there is notice from an IO that the agreement terms are acceptable.
The notification of IO acceptance is the ANN (Award Acceptance Notification). Each agreement received by Stanford is recorded in the SeRA (Stanford Electronic Research Administration) system as an award transaction. The award transaction captures key details regarding the agreement including general project level details, the amount funded, attachments including signed agreement documents, negotiations notes and key terms and conditions. These key elements are entered into the SeRA transaction by the IO who then approves the award transaction in SeRA. Once approved, the AAN is generated by the system and sent to the project stakeholders.